|
In the
last article we considered some of the challenges that come with the
command to "perfect holiness in the fear of God" (2 Corinthians
7:1). Maintaining the balance between the command to love our neighbors
and to cleanse ourselves from all defilement of the flesh and spirit is
not an easy task in our present culture. But it has never been easy in any
culture. Last time we addressed separation as it is commanded in
Scripture. Separation does not mean isolation and complete withdrawal by
association from the unbeliever. It is to be balanced with the command to
love your neighbor as yourself. We should differentiate between a healthy
and proper association with our neighbor and a spiritually unhealthy
alliance with one whose purpose in life is not to seek the glory of
Christ.
In this article we will look at an example of a godly
king in the Old Testament that violated the principle of being unequally
yoked or bound together with an ungodly king. The principle stated in the
New Testament says:
"Do not be bound together with
unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or
what fellowship has light with darkness? Or what harmony has Christ with
Belial, or what has a believer in common with an unbeliever? Or what
agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the
living God... " (2 Corinthians 6:14-16).
The word bound means to be put into a double harness or
yoked. The metaphor is of two mismatched animals being yoked together for
work. It represents the problems that will be encountered when a believer
enters into a close relationship or alliance with an unbeliever. There
will inevitably be conflict that inhibits labor and restrains direction or
purpose. Harmony will be compromised and consistency in the Christian walk
will fail. As we make our sojourn through life there must be unity of
purpose with those to whom we are closely associated. Otherwise the
strength of our focus becomes diffused and we are diverted from God’s
best for our lives. This Biblical principle would apply to personal
relationships, business partnerships, unhealthy associations in our
churches or other religious organizations, the union of marriage, and any
other association that would involve being bound or making an alliance
with anyone whose chief pursuit is not the glory of God. The Old Testament
account of the life of King Jehoshaphat serves as a good example of the
principle of being unequally yoked. Jeshoshaphat was a king of Judah of
the lineage of David and he was a good king. In fact, four chapters are
dedicated to his life and exploits. 2 Chronicles 17-20 record the account
of this king’s life. Most of the things recorded are good. We read of
his religious and political reforms and his military victories. It is said
that he "did not seek the Baals [idolatrous worship] but sought the
God of his father, followed His [God’s] commandments, and did not act as
Israel did" (2 Chronicles 17:3-4). But then in chapter 18 we read,
"Now Jehoshaphat had great riches and honor; and he allied himself
with Ahab." Ahab was the wicked king of Israel who formed an alliance
with Phoenicia. Political alliances in those days were sealed with
marriages between the Princes and Princesses of the royal families. So it
was that Ahab’s father Omri arranged the marriage of his son with the
infamous Jezebel. If you know a little about the biblical history of
Israel you know that it was Jezebel who effectively promoted the
idolatrous worship of Baal throughout the nation of Israel. It was Ahab
and Jezebel’s daughter Athaliah whose marriage in turn sealed the
alliance between Jehoshaphat, king of Judah and Ahab, king of Israel.
Without going into the historical details I would like to make some
comments as to the consequences of this alliance. This will help us to
pull some good principles concerning the consequences of being unequally
bound with unbelievers.
The Bible reads that Ahab induced Jehoshaphat to go up
with him to war against the Arameans in order to take back the city,
Ramoth-Gilead. In this battle the armies of Israel and Judah were defeated
and Jehoshaphat almost lost his life. King Ahab did lose his life. Upon
Jehoshaphat’s return to his house in Jerusalem he was confronted by the
prophet Jehu who said, "Should you help the wicked and love those who
hate the Lord and so bring wrath on yourself from the Lord?" (2
Chronicles 19:2). His alliance with Ahab was judged as helping the wicked.
Ramoth-Gilead was an important city on Israel’s northwest border. The
Arameans had taken it by force and were oppressing the people. It would
have seemed a good cause to any person’s sense of justice and yet it
involved an alliance with Ahab. Ahab and Jezebel had broken covenant with
Yahweh and were worshiping the false God Baal. It was for this that the
prophet contended with Jehoshaphat that he should not love those who hate
the Lord and bring wrath on himself. The point is that Jehoshaphat had
used the power and the influence that God had given him to promote
Ahab’s error. This is exactly the point made in 2 Corinthians 6:
"What agreement has the temple of God with idols?" We should
beware of all associations that would involve promoting wickedness. We
must trust our security and hope for the future in the Lord. Believers
must learn that true security comes within the confines of obedience to
God’s word.
Later in Jehoshaphat’s life he makes another alliance
with Ahab’s son Ahaziah. The Bible comments that "he acted wickedly
in doing so" (2 Chronicles 20:35). Jehoshaphat and Ahaziah
constructed large merchant ships in Ezion-Geber for trade with Tarshish.
Although the details are not given, their ships were destroyed, ending any
hope of economic gain for either country. Economic gain seemed to be the
motivation for this alliance. Our business ventures should not be
motivated by greed for wealth. For the believer the over-riding value for
every quest in life should be the glory of God.
In the military alliance Jehoshaphat almost lost his
life. In the business alliance he suffered great financial loss. But it
was in the marital alliance between his son Jehoram and Athaliah, (Ahab
& Jezebel’s daughter) that the greatest damage was done. After
Jehoshaphat’s death when Jehoram had taken over the kingdom and made
himself secure the Bible says, "he killed all his brothers, with the
sword, and some of the rulers of Israel also" (2 Chronicles 21:4).
The biblical commentary on Jehoram’s life is that "he walked in the
way of the kings of Israel, just as the house of Ahab did (for Ahab’s
daughter was his wife), and he did evil in the sight of the Lord" (2
Chronicles 21:6). So the political alliance of Jehoshaphat played a major
part in the death of all of his sons but the story does not end here.
After Jehoram’s death his son Ahaziah reigned for one year and was
killed in battle. His mother Athaliah (Ahab’s daughter) seized power and
had all of the royal offspring of the house of Judah destroyed (2
Chronicles 22:10). After Jehoram’s and Athaliah’s massacres all that
was left of Jehoshaphat’s offspring was one great-grandchild. All of his
other children grandchildren and great grandchildren were murdered.
The teaching of Scripture is that alliances with wicked
people can have devastating consequences. So Christians are commanded to
love their neighbors and be a friend to sinners but beware being unequally
yoked. This is not to suggest that all unbelievers will act as wickedly as
Queen Athaliah did.
One closing comment should be made for those who may
already have entered into a marriage with one who does not believe. The
command in Scripture is that a Christian brother who has an unbelieving
wife or the Christian sister who has an unbelieving husband that consents
to live with them should not send them away (1 Corinthians 7:12-14). The
presence of the believer sets the home apart to have a Christian influence
on both the unbelieving spouse and their children. Since the marriage
covenant involves a public oath, "till death do us part," the
Christian should abide by their promise before God and man. In fact every
oath taken in the name of the Lord is binding, whether business, personal
or otherwise. This would be the policy for any contractual agreement.
|