Our last discussion of
the eighth Article of Faith underscored the fact that
Mormons claim that the Book of Mormon is superior
to the Bible, but no evidence for that claim exists. We
listed seven popular LDS claims for the Book of
Mormon and showed that they are not valid claims. In
1981 the Mormon Church officially added "Another
Testament of Jesus Christ" as a subtitle to the
Book of Mormon. But that subtitle is also erroneous
because the Book of Mormon is not "another
testament" of Jesus Christ.
If the
Book of Mormon was a true history of real people it
might be called "another testimony" or "another
witness" of Jesus Christ, but not "another testament"
because it is not a "new covenant" that God made
between the ancestors of the American Indians and Jesus
Christ. The word "testament" comes from the Greek word
diatheke, which can mean a "covenant" and it is
often translated that way." So, the Old Testament
was a covenant that God made with ancient Israel
and the New Testament was a later covenant
that God made with those who believe in Jesus Christ for
salvation. The Book of Mormon is not a new
covenant with anyone. It is only a mixture of Old
and New Testament teachings which it claims were taught
to the ancestors of the Native Americans.
Mormons also frequently hold the
Book of Mormon together with the Bible and call it a
second witness for Christ. But the Book of
Mormon can’t be a second witness for Christ because
long before anyone knew about it, there were 27
books in the New Testament that testified of Christ! And
before the New Testament was written, Jesus
declared the Old Testament testified of Him when He
said, "Search the scriptures; for in them ye
think ye have eternal life; and they are they that
testify of Me. And ye will not come to Me that ye might
have life" (John 5:39-40). Before the New Testament was
written the Apostle Paul also said that the Old
Testament testified of Christ when he wrote, "From a
child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which
are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith
which is in Christ Jesus" (II Tim. 3:15). These verses
show that in addition to the 27 New Testament books
which testify of Christ, many Old Testament books also
testified of Him. The Old Testament was the only
scripture known before the New Testament was written.
Because many books in the Old and New Testaments
testified of Christ before the Book of Mormon,
it can never be a second witness for Christ.
Furthermore, there is absolutely
nothing new about Christ in the Book of Mormon
that is essential to know in order to have eternal life
with Him. Some LDS claim that it tells about such things
as Christ’s visit to America after His resurrection in
Jerusalem. There is no evidence to support such a visit
by Christ, but even if it were true, it isn’t
essential to anyone’s salvation. But why would Christ
come to America to deliver His message when He had just
given the command to His disciples to "Go into all the
world and preach the gospel to every creature" (Mark
16:15)? If He personally visited the people in America
did He also visit every continent? If not, why did He
only visit America?
Mormons often claim that the ancient
inhabitants of America needed the Book of Mormon
because Christ is the Savior of the whole world. Using
that same logic, books of scripture would also be needed
for Africa, Asia, Australia and other areas. The Book
of Mormon even declares, "Wherefore, because that ye
have a Bible ye need not suppose that it contains all my
words; neither need ye suppose that I have not caused
more to be written…. For behold, I shall speak unto the
Jews and they shall write it; and I shall also speak
unto the Nephites (in America) and they shall write it;
and I shall also speak unto other tribes of the house of
Israel, which I have led away, and they shall write it;
and I shall also speak unto all nations of the
earth and they shall write it" (II Nephi 29:10, 12). But
no scripture like the Book of Mormon has been
found in any other nation and the Mormon Church probably
would not accept it if any was found because they have
defined their scripture as their own four standard
works. And even though the Book of Mormon teaches
that God will speak to all nations just like He
did to the ancient Americans, LDS missionaries are
taking translations of the Book of Mormon to all
of the other nations they can! Why are they doing that
if each nation wrote God’s messages to them as the
Book of Mormon teaches?
The Book of Mormon claims to be
a sacred history of a few ancient Israelites who came to
America and their descendants divided into two nations.
The "Lamanite" nation was evil and dark skinned while
the "Nephite" nation was a righteous, white skinned
people that believed in Christ. They fought constantly
with each other until the Nephites were annihilated by
the Lamanites about 421 A D, leaving only the dark
skinned ancestors of the Native Americans for Columbus
to find in 1692. But before their demise, a few Nephites
record their history on gold plates. That history
included messages of their prophets as well as Christ’s
visit to them after His resurrection. Moroni, the last
Nephite, buried that record in a hill in New York State
just before he was killed. That is the story in the
Book of Mormon.
Joseph Smith claimed he was 17 in 1823
when Moroni appeared to him as an angel and showed him
the record on gold plates which he later translated as
the Book of Mormon. But there is no historical or
archaeological evidence that support the existence of
the people found in the Book of Mormon. Nor is
there any evidence that ancient Americans were
visited by Jesus Christ, or that they believed in Him or
even knew about Him! Archaeological evidence shows that
some of those ancient Americans offered human sacrifice,
which is not very good evidence that they were believers
in Jesus Christ as the Book of Mormon claims!
For those wanting to know more about
the Book of Mormon, see the chapter on it in my
book Mormon Claims Answered. Next month we will
consider the ninth Article of Faith which deals with
revelation.